Showing posts with label New York Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York Times. Show all posts

Friday, April 8, 2011

In the tank or on the plate? Bioenergy vs. Food. It's game on.

by Michael Arbow, MBA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

 

Jeffery Rubin in his book “Why your world is about to get a whole lot smaller” talks about triple digit oil prices and the effects this will have on our economies one being the push to bio-energy; energy derived from plants such as corn, sugar cane, palm oil.  Interestingly as the price of these commodities has risen the Chinese have sought out other plants capable of producing an oil substitute.  They have recently moved to and focused on cassava, a tropical plant whose root we use for animal feed, tapioca pudding and ice cream.  While the ingenuity is admirable the effects of this and new government regulations forcing the consumption of bio-energy is having distributing ramifications namely a growing trade-off between crops for fuel or crops for food.  The upshot of this is an unstable equilibrium in food commodity prices which looks set to continue for the foreseeable future.

 

What all this means to the food processors and bio-fuel makers is that price volatility may become the new normal and having a better economic understanding of price movement causality may be beyond the skill sets of the accounting department and conceivably the more traditional risk management team.

 

 

For more on the food/energy trade-off click on the link to a New York Times article:

http://tinyurl.com/3b6tfgz

 

For more on Mr. Rubin’s thoughts on energy prices, click on the link:

http://www.jeffrubinssmallerworld.com/blog/

Thursday, March 3, 2011

NYT not WSJ

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.rsdsolutions.com

info@rsdsolutions.com

 

 

When I worked on a trading desk in New York I always made it a point to read the New York Times rather than the Wall Street Journal.  Those who know me will laugh and wonder why – I am not what you would call your typical NYT person. 

There are three main reasons why I did so:

  1. Everyone else read the Journal and thus if there was something worth knowing about in the WSJ, I was sure to find out about it through the chatter on the desk
  2. It gave me a different point of view and something different to talk about on the desk and with my customers (most of whom also read the WSJ) 
  3. The NYT frequently left me angry after reading its editorials which I often did not agree with.  I figured it was good to get out of my comfort zone on a regular basis. 

 

Does everyone in your risk department read the same newspaper?  Do they easily and comfortably get into groupthink having their ideas continually and consistently generated from the same source?  Do their sources for information generate a broad portfolio of ideas?  (Are a lot of ideas a good thing?)  Do they ever wander outside of their comfort zones?  Do they get passionate about ideas?