Showing posts with label quantitative easing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quantitative easing. Show all posts

Thursday, November 24, 2011

Quantitative Inflation

By Stephen McPhie, CA

RSD Solutions Inc.,

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com 

 

The American and British cure for many of our current ills has been printing money. Quantitative easing as those who practice it are concerned.  Germans, especially the head of the Bundesbank are dead set against it.  They view it as a way to let some countries off the hook.  They also believe it will lead sooner or late rot inflation – a logical view. 

 

Perhaps like many, for or against it, you just desperately hope for the best and that it will work somehow and lead to strong growth.  However, if you are a financial executive in the US or UK, do you also countenance the inflation possibility?  A medium term view is important and the consequences of inflation should be considered in risk management.  In spite of a benign rate environment, caused partly by flight to quality), consequences include higher interest rates.

Thursday, October 6, 2011

QE2 sets sail in the UK. The emerging markets say “Thank you”.

by Michael Arbow, MBA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

The Bank of England decided today that because of the Euro-crisis and a sluggish home economy the financial system in the UK needed more quantitative easing: a flood of cash to build some forward economic momentum.  Over the near future the Bank will purchase £75 billion (about 115 billion USD) of bonds with freshly printed money in the hope (?) that the financial crisis hitting Europe will, at worse, only have a minor impact on the UK economy.   Will this new flood of cash help the UK avoid the effects of the contagion now pulsing through Europe?  That is the question that has economist offering as many answers as there are economist plus one.  Regardless of the effect on the UK, there is a more generally accepted feeling that the more powerful benefits will be to the emerging markets.  To quote Sir Terry Leahy (ex boss of Tesco):  “QE created an awful lot of liquidity intended for the real economy but found a home in markets and speculators looking for quick returns."

 

We witnessed from the Great Recession the power of quantitative easing’s effects on the economies of the emerging markets.  The positive effects included creating new wealth and a near unprecedented increase in their middle classes.  This benefit came back to haunt the easing nations in the form of a high commodity prices which have arguably contributed to a sluggish economic recovery and increased talks of a second dip recession.

 

What does this mean for risk departments?  Keep an eye on the horizon and watch for signs of other countries joining the QE parade.  It may be time to revisit those hedging strategies you put off due to the current pullback in commodity prices – it’s days may be short lived. 

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Preliminary Thoughts on Bernanke’s Speech at Jackson Hole and Fed Policy Options

by Don Alexander, MBA

Associate, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

The most important event this week is tomorrow's speech by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke at the annual Kansas City Fed Conference.  The speech is expected to focus on three elements: the downgrading of US economic prospects, a defense of past policy actions and an outline of Fed policy options.

 

Last year, Mr. Bernanke outlined details for QE II and Fed policy options: the purchase of long-term securities, communication and lowering the interest rate paid on excess reserves.  The Friday speech will most likely focus on:  the possibility of additional purchases of long-term securities and changing the composition of the balance sheet. 

 

The Fed will note the downgrading of US economic prospects, as mentioned in the recent FOMC minutes.  This view will be consistent with the lowering of US growth prospects done by a number of Wall Street (WS) analysts.  The most recent FOMC communiqué noted “a slower pace of recovery in coming quarters” and “downside risks to the economic outlook have increased”.  However, the Fed economic outlook has one key difference from WS analysts as evidenced in recent speeches by Fed officials “weakness in economic activity in the first half was due to temporary factors …” and “restraining forces have abated and thus, we should see stronger growth in the second half”.  This suggests the Fed takes the view that the slowdown was partially caused by temporary factors.  The Fed scenario is for weak growth followed by a modest recovery going into 2012.  This is slightly more optimistic than private sector forecasts.

 

The next point, to be addressed by Mr. Bernanke, is the defense of previous Fed easing efforts.  The combination of weakness in growth and downward revision to economic forecasts raise questions about effectiveness of recent policy efforts.  Previously, he argued that QE helped reduce deflation risk and raised inflation expectations.  Mr. Bernanke will most likely address these issues as follows: the first is that central banks (Fed) cannot be the sole source of stimulus in a global fiscal tightening environment; secondly, one way QE II was successful by avoiding another recession (to date) and deflation; and lastly there is evidence from economic studies that QE does have a positive impact on growth.  The jury is still out on QE II, but it has helped the economy – the question is how much?

 

As indicated earlier, the three options open to the Fed include: communication, asset purchases and balance sheet management and changing the interest rate paid on excess reserves.  The Fed has already implemented a variation of its communication policy by stating that rates will remain low for an extended period.  The Fed will not consider changing the interest rates on excess reserves due to technical aspects of implementation, potential damage to banks from already low rates and questionable impact on bank lending.

 

This leaves the last option of large-scale asset purchases and changing the composition of the balance sheet.  There are studies that suggest that selling short-dated treasuries and buying long-dated can have a significant impact on reducing real rates.  The reason why this option may be favored is that it will not change the size of the Fed balance sheet which would keep politicians happy.  The view among WS analysts is that Mr. Bernanke will present these options, but not pre-commit to any policy action except through the FOMC.  The recent rise in core inflation will keep policymakers cautious.  The use of any unconventional policy options such as a higher inflation target, price level targeting, a long-term interest rate target or option twist (used in the early 1960s) may be considered at a later date.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

The (Forgetful) Dismal Scientists or “Yesterday’s logic is illogical today”

by Michael Arbow MBA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.rsdsolutions.com

info@rsdsolutions.com

 

As the US Federal Reserve Chairman’s own version of the QE2 sets sail, commodity prices continue their upward move. The upward march in oil was initially caused by the increase in demand for product as world oil consumption moved from about 88 million barrels/day last year towards an expected 90 million this year. More recently, Brent crude has been pushed above $100 because of increased uncertainty of continued delivery from the Middle East.

Now those of us with long memories, say 12 months, will recall that the dismal scientists as economists are affectionately (?) known, predicting that the next recession would start when oil trades above $100 USD/bbl. Interestingly, the Street has not renewed their talking of this outcome but rather they focus on the renewed and continued strength of the US economy. It is strange that all the arguments Street economist gave about the effects of triple digit oil and $4.00/gallon gasoline 12 short months ago are no longer gain attention.

This blog raises 2 points:

  1. It takes a paradigm shift for yesterday’s logic to be illogical or have reduced impact. Effective risk management must be dynamic but not at the expenses of forgetting the past.
  1. It looks like price volatility will continue in 2011 and downside risk is starting to appear.For corporate risk managers: what are you doing now that the likelihood of downside economic risk is increasing or are you seeking safety in the crowd?

In fairness.  I caught the following (taken from the Globe and Mail) just prior to posting:

"The International Energy Agency’s (IEA) executive director Nobuo Tanaka said prices above $100 per barrel for the rest of the year could drag the global economy back into a repeat of the 2008 economic crisis."