Showing posts with label risk team. Show all posts
Showing posts with label risk team. Show all posts

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Hiring Diversity (Part 1 of 4)

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

We all understand the power of diversity and the evils of groupthink that is caused by a lack of diversity in thought, opinions and ideas.  However have you taken time to look around at the key members of the risk team at your organization?  (By the way, the key members of your risk team may not be a part of the risk team.)  How much diversity is there in your risk management system?  When you closely examine the structure you will see two, perhaps three distinct clusters of individuals – perhaps the wise old experienced ones who hold the institutional knowledge of how things have been done for the last century, and those with advanced degrees of some shape or form that generally are quantitatively based.  No offense, but that is not the most diversified of portfolios.  To rectify the situation I propose at least four new hires for your organization’s risk system.  Unfortunately I expect few will take my advice, but for those that do I strongly believe that there will be unexpected rewards and pleasant surprises.

 

In no particular order …

 

Each risk system should have an epidemiologist.  Yes – someone who studies and understands the growth of health issues throughout a region, a country or even the world.  An epidemiologist understands that things spread.  They also understand how things spread and they appreciate the fact that the spread is not always by the usual causes.  They also understand the models for spread are not always linear and predictable.  They know about creating firewalls and how containment strategies work and also how they fail.  They also know how to connect the dots going backward – not because each health crisis is similar (they’re not, they are all unique) – but so they can learn lessons that will help and provide clues when the next inevitable threat of a crisis rears its head.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Throwing Out PowerPoint 1

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com 

 

This seems to be a week of creating presentations.  I like presenting, but creating presentations is not really my favorite activity.  All of my best presentations are bespoke and are designed to zig when the audience wants to (or needs to) zig, and to zag when that is what the situation calls for.  PowerPoint is a wonderful tool, but it locks you down into a linear path when sometimes the situation calls for more flexibility.

 

To that end I have gone in search of new presentation software.  One that will allow for a more non-linear approach.  I found one that I liked Prezi (www.Prezi.com), and will be testing it out in front of a live audience later this week.

 

Prezi is quite easy to use, but there is still a nagging worry in the back of my mind.  The point is that I know PowerPoint.  My audience knows PowerPoint and what to expect with PowerPoint.  I am not sure how they will react to a whole new presentation style?  How will I react to a whole new presentation style?  What if I make a mistake with the new presentation format? Will people laugh at me?  No one I know has used this software, and I have only seen the presentations with it on the internet – and we all know that they were probably edited a thousand times to make sure they ran smoothly.  Oh my, I can come up with a thousand different things that might go wrong.  Well, actually I can only come up with four or five things that might go wrong, but I am sure that there are at least a thousand things that might go wrong ….

 

Does the above paragraph of whining and useless worry sound like you and your risk team when it comes to trying something new?  I bet it does.  Times change, things change, people change, and organizations change.  You and your risk department also need to change.  Now – where is that Word Perfect file that I just downloaded from my Tandy computer?

 

Throwing Out PowerPoint 1

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com 

 

This seems to be a week of creating presentations.  I like presenting, but creating presentations is not really my favorite activity.  All of my best presentations are bespoke and are designed to zig when the audience wants to (or needs to) zig, and to zag when that is what the situation calls for.  PowerPoint is a wonderful tool, but it locks you down into a linear path when sometimes the situation calls for more flexibility.

 

To that end I have gone in search of new presentation software.  One that will allow for a more non-linear approach.  I found one that I liked Prezi (www.Prezi.com), and will be testing it out in front of a live audience later this week.

 

Prezi is quite easy to use, but there is still a nagging worry in the back of my mind.  The point is that I know PowerPoint.  My audience knows PowerPoint and what to expect with PowerPoint.  I am not sure how they will react to a whole new presentation style?  How will I react to a whole new presentation style?  What if I make a mistake with the new presentation format? Will people laugh at me?  No one I know has used this software, and I have only seen the presentations with it on the internet – and we all know that they were probably edited a thousand times to make sure they ran smoothly.  Oh my, I can come up with a thousand different things that might go wrong.  Well, actually I can only come up with four or five things that might go wrong, but I am sure that there are at least a thousand things that might go wrong ….

 

Does the above paragraph of whining and useless worry sound like you and your risk team when it comes to trying something new?  I bet it does.  Times change, things change, people change, and organizations change.  You and your risk department also need to change.  Now – where is that Word Perfect file that I just downloaded from my Tandy computer?

 

Sunday, March 13, 2011

When project completion is in sight; negativity is not

by Michael Arbow MBA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.rsdsolutions.com

info@rsdsolutions.com

 

According to a study conducted at George Washington University by Jaclyn M. Jensen entitled “The Consequences of Completion: How Level of Completion Influences Information Concealment by Decision Makers”, the closer a project is to completion the less likely knowledge of a significant problem is to effect the action of decision makers. In fact even when the test project was barely off the ground with only 10% complete, 37.5% of the test subjects said they would not bring forward negative news. This simple experiment helps support the need for a independent risk management team working directly with C-level or senior management and at the same time being involved, and in contact with, all significant operations of the company. 

How independent is your risk team and how are they keeping their finger on the daily corporate pulse? The other issue here is how does your firm and its staff deal with adverse occurrences that could jeopardize a much touted project and how can they not fall into mode of behaviour seen in the above experiment?  Finally, just how approachable is the risk team? Does your staff feel that the risk team is working with them or for C-level?