Friday, December 30, 2011

European Banking System – Systemic Risk Accident?

by Don Alexander, MBA

Associate, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

 

Basic research is like shooting an arrow into the air and,

Where it lands, painting a target (Homer Adkins)

 

The euro is heading toward an abyss. The sovereign debt crisis is evolving into a full-fledged banking crisis with global consequences.  Nicholas Veron, of the Peterson Institute, has written a short-article on issues facing European banks   Europe Must Change Course on Banks” (Dec. 19th).

 

The crisis is evolving along multiple dimensions.  On the sovereign debt, Greece’s debt restructuring remains unresolved, and Italy and Spain face major refinancing needs in early 2012.  Eurozone countries may have to refinance between euro 1.2-1.5 trillion in 2012.   The Eurozone summit on December 9th, fell short of delivering a true fiscal union, and raised tensions within the euro area and with the United Kingdom.  On the growth front, a possible deep and prolonged recession looms, especially as countries place emphasis on fiscal austerity.

 

The banking system is a crucial piece of the puzzle and epitomizes the contradictions of Europe’s experiment with monetary union.  Since 2007, the system has exhibited gaps in risk management, and massive supervisory failures in some countries.  The banks are exposed to an agency problem – they are under national control, but pose risks for the euro. To keep on favorable terms with local authorities, they are often buyers of last resort after failed auctions.  In the past two years, deteriorating sovereign creditworthiness has increased the system’s fragility, especially since they depend on wholesale money markets for funding.  CDS premiums remain elevated for European sovereign debt  

 

Political affirmation of the integrity of the euro area banking system does not require new treaties, but major resistance comes from, among others, individual banks fearing the loss of national privileges or protections.  However, the creation of a “banking union,” parallel to the fiscal union now advocated by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, would not mean the end of all national and local specificities.  A euro-area-level banking policy framework that will transcend interdependences between banking and political structures at the national and local level is a necessary condition for the survival of the monetary union.

 

As the euro crisis continues to unfold, there is increasing risk that the crisis could move across the Atlantic.  The near-term conduit from the banking system through money markets, derivatives or some other under radar surprise.  A longer-term mechanism is through a severe credit contraction that could induce a global recession.

 

The problem for global banks, especially for European banks, is that Basel I and II encouraged banks to hold sovereign debt as risk-free.  Basel III imposes more capital requirements and it will require additional euro hundred billions of capital over that suggested by recent stress tests.  The question is how European banks can meet the new capital shortfalls without causing growth stagnation?

 

The immediate goal for European authorities is provide standardization of regulation across the Eurozone such as national interests do not subvert the euro.  Long-term European banks have to be recapitalized without causing a severe credit contraction.  It will require prudent central bank policy and cooperation between national regulators.  The failure to implement prudent reforms could result in a near-term freeze in bank funding or a global recession.  Neither outcome is provides a favorable target for a sustainable US recovery.

 

For more on this follow the link: http://www.piie.com/realtime/?p=2581

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Four Hard Truths for 2011 – Risks for 2012

by Don Alexander, MBA

Associate, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

History is the science of things which are never repeated (P. Valery)

 

The year 2011 was supposed to be the year that broke the back of the global crisis.  However, the crisis is still with us as the North Atlantic banking part of the crisis morphed into the Eurozone crisis.  The persistence of the European sovereign debt crisis risks moving toward a full-blown banking crisis.  The impact of slower growth in the advanced countries now threatens emerging economies.  Olivier Blanchard, the chief IMF Economist, looks at some of these issues in a VOXEU communique called “Blanchard on 2011’s four hard truths” dated December 23rd.

 

The global economy entered 2011 in a recovery mode, although weak and unbalanced.  However the issues appeared tractable: dealing with excessive US housing debt, adjustment of countries on the periphery of Europe, how to handle volatile capital flows to emerging markets and to improve financial sector regulation.  It was a long agenda, but appeared within reach.  As the year draws to a close, a number is issues remain unresolved: the recovery in many advanced countries is at a standstill, the implications of a potential breakup of the Eurozone and the possibilities that conditions could deteriorate.

 

The four main lessons that Blanchard sees: the global economy is in a state of self-fulfilling outcomes of pessimism or optimism with major macroeconomic implications.  The self-fulfilling attacks can lead to bank runs which reduce the distance between a sovereign debt crisis and a full-fledged banking crisis.  Government entities have provided liquidity to ensure market interest rates remain reasonable.  The main risks remain for banks in Europe and the rollover of sovereign debt.

 

Secondly, incomplete or partial policy measures can make things worse.  We have seen how perception got worse after high-level meetings in Europe promised a solution, but delivered only half without details.  The announcement was made with great fanfare, but turned out insufficient with potential obstacles.

 

Thirdly, financial investors are schizophrenic about fiscal consolidation and growth.  Investors react favorably to positive news on fiscal consolidation, but tend to ignore lower growth which can lead to increase, not a decrease, on risk spreads on government bonds.  Fiscal consolidation is required to reduce debt to prudent levels, but not to produce stagnation “slow and steady wins the race”.

 

Lastly, perception molds reality.  This was the case of conditions in Europe.  Once Italy was considered as a risk, the perception did not go away.  The concern about the viability of the European economy led to concerns about the possible breakup for the Eurozone.

 

If you put the four factors together, you can explain why entering into 2012 why macroeconomic risks have increased.  It will be harder for officials to put the recovery back on track than it was a year ago.  Fiscal consolidation is required without causing growth stagnation.  Central banks and governments will be required to provide liquidity as a backstop to prevent a bank runs and avoid multiple equilibria.  It will require plans not only announced, but implemented with full disclosure and effective collaboration among all involved.

 

We have to learn from our mistakes in 2011, otherwise 2012 is going to be a period of higher risks.  The alternative is just too unattractive.

 

For more on this follow the link:  www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/7475

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Step by Step Approach to Crisis Resolution

by Don Alexander, MBA

Associate, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSdsolutions.com

                                    

 

Politics is not the art of the possible.

It consists of choosing between

                                            The disastrous and the unpalatable 

                                                          (JKGalbraith)


Eurozone officials and politicians have adopted a mini step-by-step approach to crisis resolution.  This approach has back-fired as cost of crisis resolution has increased dramatically as the sovereign debt crisis is turning into a full blown banking crisis.  The European Central Bank (ECB) finally took a big step last week when they made nearly euro 500 billion in three-year low rate loans available to 500 banks across the region.  This comes ahead of a crucial time for policymakers as a large volume of sovereign and bank debt has to be refinanced in the first quarter of 2012.  The ECB has provided a near-term fix for the Eurozone crisis, but what has to be addressed longer-term?

 

Charles Goodhart & Dirk Schoenmaker in “The Political Endgame for the Euro Crisis” (VOXEU, Dec. 14th) discuss some of these issues.  The euro crisis is deepening, as European leaders continue with their “too little too late” policy reforms.  Solving Eurozone problems requires a strong direction for fiscal and banking policy.  This in turn needs greater political integration through an elected president of the European Commission and a two-chamber parliament representing EU citizens and EU member states. 

 

The euro has a supranational monetary policy framework, while the fiscal side is still national or inter-governmental.  With political legitimacy, the President of the European Commission could: first, enforce budget discipline on participating members and restrict the impact of fiscal spending, and second oversee Eurozone banking supervision and resolution to foster banking system stability. 

 

One step is the establishment of a Eurozone Minister of Finance with power to enforce provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact on fiscal deficits.  A second step is a reform of the parliamentary side of the political union by establishing one chamber to address issues of the electorate and a second chamber to represent interests of the separate member countries.  This would allow a gradual transition of banking supervision and resolution from the national level toward a wider European scale.  The new Eurozone Finance Minister would need specific authority from the European Parliament to establish budgetary and banking powers and the European equivalent of the FDIC, SEC, etc. 

 

The resolution of the euro crisis needs both political reforms as well as a technocratic solution.  There are major issues that need to be addressed, but the min-step approach to financial crisis resolution or risk management has a cost – often a higher cost.

 

For more on this follow the link:

 www.voxeu.com/index.php?q=node/7420

 

 

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Fast Company Creativity Issue

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

I just finished the latest Fast Company issue, which was centered on creativity.  Creativity is not a word that you hear a lot about in risk management.  Neither is the term “Fast Company” for that matter.  Why is this?  Is this a good thing?