Friday, June 1, 2012

The End Of The Euro: A Survivor’s Guide

by Don Alexander, MBA

Associate, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

In every economic crisis there comes a moment of clarity. In Europe soon, millions of people will wake up to realize that the euro-as-we-know-it is gone. The economic consequences of a failed system await them.

This is the thesis outlined by Peter Boone and Simon Johnson in their recent Baseline Scenario blog dated May 28th.  It is also a classic failure of risk management and its failure to correct initial flaws in the creation of the euro.

Europe’s crisis to date is a series of “decisive” turning points that have been nothing but another step down a steep hill.  Currently, Greece has faced five years of recession, over 20 percent unemployment, a series of broken promises from politicians and EU bureaucrats, resulting in political backlash.  Greece’s economy can only get worse.  

Some European politicians are now telling us that an orderly euro zone exit for Greece is feasible under current conditions, and Greece will be the only nation that leaves. They are wrong. Greece’s exit is simply another step in a chain of events that leads towards a chaotic dissolution of the euro zone

During the next stage of the crisis, Europe’s taxpayers will be rudely awakened to the large financial risks that have been foisted upon them in failed attempts to keep the single currency alive.  The cost to taxpayers if Greece quits the euro could easily reach euro 300 billion.  However, the ECB has taken the view that it has not taken any excessive risk.

A likely scenario is that the ECB realizes it has taken on a large amount of credit risk on its books.  Investors start to flee peripheral banks and ECB funds fail to turn the tide.  Capital flight could last for several months pushing a number of countries into a deep recession.  German taxpayers will revolt at the additional exposure.

It is time for European and IMF officials, with support from the US and others, to work on how to dismantle the euro area. While no dissolution will be truly orderly, there are means to reduce the chaos. Many technical, legal, and financial market issues could be worked out in advance.

 We need plans to deal with: the introduction of new currencies, multiple sovereign defaults, recapitalization of banks and insurance groups, and divvying up the assets and liabilities of the euro system. Some nations will soon need foreign reserves to backstop their new currencies. Most importantly, Europe needs to salvage its great achievements, including free trade and labor mobility across the continent, while extricating itself from this colossal error of a single currency.

This should be a good lesson for risk management of a flawed system design and the failure to make corrections.  What is your euro exposure?

For more on this, follow the link: http://tinyurl.com/bsan8zc

Thursday, May 31, 2012

John Adams

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

 

John Adams is an American icon.  Known for many things, including being the second President of the United States (and fathering the sixth President).  John Adams is also known for his wisdom.  One of his quotes is “You can’t ensure success.  You can only deserve it.”  A useful motto for risk managers.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

European Banking Union and Systemic Risk

by Don Alexander, MBA

Associate, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

There is increasing agreement between policymakers and academics that a banking union, along with some form of fiscal union, is necessary if Europe is to emerge from the crisis and stabilize.  Currently, politicians tend to focus on a short-term fix and avoid making hard decisions.  Nicholas Veron, addresses some of these issues in a recent VOXEU communique dated May 23rd, Is Europe ready for a banking union?

 

As the global financial system has become more complex, concentrated and interconnected, Europe’s vulnerability to systemic risk has increased.  The fragility of the European banking system was revealed in the subprime/Lehman shock of 2007-2008 and has never been properly addressed since then – despite several stress tests.

 

Policymakers now agree a banking union (federal framework) is required in order to break the feedback loop between sovereigns and banks, essentially through risk sharing across borders in the banking system.  The monetary union needs to be supported by stronger financial integration in the form of unified supervision, a single bank resolution authority with a common backstop and a single deposit insurance fund. 

 

Policymakers now agree that a banking union, together with a fiscal union, is a necessary condition for a sustainable Eurozone monetary union and a resolution of the current crisis.  The action taken to date is modest.  Veron notes there are certain impediments to banking integration:

 

1.      the UK, Europe’s largest financial hub, is a non-euro member and resists encroachment on supervisory authority

2.      a number of euro-member states continue to resist any encroachment on local banks closely linked to local politicians

3.      EU member states continue to resist risk-sharing agreements or cross-border transfers.  These constraints prevent Europe from a first step toward establishing a consistent architecture for its banking union.

 

Certain reforms should be urgent priorities:

 

1.      banks must share risks as widely as possible

2.      Europe also needs the ability to restructure banks without national politicians or regulators 

3.      A cross-national guarantee is needed for national deposit insurance systems to prevent a retail bank run. 

 

European-level supervisory structures should eventually be established to prevent moral hazard.

 

European authorities would like to have time to fine-tune complex legal and financial issues to combine with different pieces into a consistent banking policy framework.  However, the current moment calls for less fine-tuning and more swift and bold action to contain systemic risk.

 

What is your exposure to European banks?

 

For more on this, follow the link: www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/8027

 

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

The Value of Ignorance

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

 

Sometimes it pays to be ignorant.  You are forced to make connections between the things you know about and the things you do not know about.  You are forced to proceed in baby steps; checking results along the way and constantly correcting and adjusting your path.  When you are ignorant you are forced to synthesize.  When you don’t know, you feel weak and humble.

 

When you know – that is when you are not ignorant – you confidently charge ahead, damming the torpedoes along the way.  With knowledge you feel powerful and invincible.

 

When you don’t know about something you are forced to pause and to think.  That is valuable.

Monday, May 28, 2012

The (short?) story of your life

by Michael Arbow, MBA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

Old_man
While we can be best advised to consider risk carefully, as the old guy demonstrates we can sometimes take our analysis and possible ramifications just that tad bit too far.  When you or your business or association consider risk do you sometimes find yourself going off the shallow end of the pool all the time?  Sadly the ramifications could mean lost opportunities and a long boring, non benchmark worthy life.

 

A special thanks to: Steve Martin (the British one) at http://coolrisk.com/

Sunday, May 27, 2012

da Vinci

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

Leonardo da Vinci was perhaps the last of the polymaths - a man of many intellectual talents in a wide diversity of fields.  It is interesting to think what he would have thought of risk management as a profession if he were alive today.  It is perhaps even more interesting to ponder what the risk management profession would have thought of him.  He was very good in a wide variety of areas, but it is difficult to say exactly what he was a specific expert in.  da Vinci was a true polymath and a true lateral thinker.  It is an interesting thought experiment to ask how many risk departments would have hired him – after all, he did not have a degree in financial engineering.