Friday, July 29, 2011

Damned if you do and damned if you don’t

by Stephen McPhie, CA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

U.S. politicians are playing roulette with that country’s AAA debt rating with their inability to agree raising the debt ceiling along with meaningful deficit reduction measures.

 

Last year the UK enacted meaningful deficit measures with a harsh austerity program and received plaudits from certain international institutions including the IMF for its actions.  The AAA debt rating was thought to be secure and medium term growth prospects bright.  However, Tuesday’s Daily Telegraph reports that this rating is now in jeopardy due to [1] lower than expected growth.  It is rumoured that the Prime Minister wants the Chancellor to stimulate the economy somehow although he also says that further stimulus is unaffordable.  What would change of course do to the market perceptions of the country and its credit rating?  Probably nothing positive!

 

Of course, the cause of all this is mass irresponsibility on the part of politicians in many countries over several years.  They can’t resist spending other peoples’ money.  Furthermore, they only have a short-term vision (if any at all) - their outlook generally stretches until no further than the next but one election, which usually means an absolute maximum of 8 years.  That usually leaves someone else to pick up the mess with those that caused it are often hailed as wonderful and visionary.

 

Personally, having lived in Canada during the deficit and debt ridden years in the 1980’s and 1990’s and coming to London in 2000, I was horrified by Gordon Brown’s 2001 budget that turned the spending tap wide open and set the UK’s fiscal health on course to where we know it ended up.  The opposition was too timid to mount any significant attack and essentially ended up buying into the big spending – until the political mood changed and they changed with it.  I remember telling anyone who would listen that this was fiscal madness and would end in tears sooner or later.  However my audience was small as nobody listened.  Good times were rolling along on a sea of debt, both public and private.

 

There is no easy solution and no painless solution to all of this.  Deficit reduction (let alone any thought of debt reduction) reduces growth at a time of moribund growth.  Stimulus might provide short relief at a cost of higher future interest costs and higher inflation and result in more difficult decisions later.  In fact, as fiscal situations worsen, decisions are taken away more and more from politicians and dictated more and more by the market.

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Appearance vs. Reality

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com 

 

Going through airport security has certainly changed air travel.  It appears to be almost harder to successfully pass through airport security with evil intent than it is to rob from Fort Knox.  The appearance (or at least as far as the various governmental agencies would like us to believe) is that airports are the safest places in the world, and the place where one is least likely to encounter a terrorist.  But is that the reality?

 

Likewise in your organization you undoubtedly have risk management practices in place that seem to safeguard the organization against specific instances of harm or ill-effects.  But is that the reality?

 

Furthermore who determines the level (and depth) of the reality?  The person who built the system?  Do you think they might have a bias?  Do you think if they had a blind spot in building the system that they might also have a blind spot in assessing it?

 

So again – is your risk management built for appearance, or is it built for reality?

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Cats

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

 

Cats are intended to teach us that not everything in nature has a function

 

Garrison Keillor 

 

My Golden has a strict mathematical function: Food = Attention.  My wife’s cats (notice that I specifically label it as “not my cat”) are completely random in their behavior.  They have no function, mathematical or otherwise.  (Fortunately my wife does not read my blogs.)

 

In risk management we like to put mathematical functions on things (distributions for the more educationally advanced).  However risk events tend to be more like cats than Golden Retrievers. 

 

Risk events show us time and again that “Risks are intended to teach us that not everything in nature has a function”.

 

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Ain’t So

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

It’s not what we don’t know that hurts, it’s what we know that ain’t so.

 

Will Rogers

 

The American humorist Will Rogers may have been a pundit of risk management without anyone knowing it. 

 

 

How often does someone in risk management (and we are all in risk management whether we have the title or not) speak up and say something that is thought to be a truism is anything but?  The field of risk management deals in uncertainty – a fact that seems to be frequently forgotten.  Yes – I understand the mathematics of uncertainty – and yes I appreciate their use.  However I also appreciate their overuse and the power associated with them.  Nassim Taleb of course has written about this point in many different forums (his book “Fooled by Randomness is still underappreciated in my opinion). 

 

The quest is always on for mitigating or lessening what we don’t know.  And that quest should continue.  However there also needs to be a continuous ongoing quest to examine what we do know to make sure that it is (a) valid, and (b) still valid.  Things change.  Risk management changes.  Axioms do not change, but we have very few (any?) axioms in risk management.

 

However how many managers and risk managers (even marketing managers) have under-appreciated Will Rogers simple statement.  I fear it is way too many and too few are ignoring the words of a humorist from the early part of the last century.  Actually I fear that way too many risk managers are ignoring simple statements.

 

Monday, July 25, 2011

Greek Holiday

by Stephen McPhie, CA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com  

 

So Greece, Portugal, et al get a bit of a holiday from the attention of the world’s media.  Their fates are not really in their own hands.  However attention has shifted for now to the U.S. whose fate is still largely in its own hands.

 

The rest of the world looks on askance at the inability of dogmatic politicians to compromise on an issue that could fundamentally harm their own country and many of its citizens.  The possibility of it harming other countries is likely of little or no concern to them.

 

Most of us think that we elect politicians to try to solve problems rather than creating them by petty squabbles amongst themselves.  And for those who think there is some sort of principal involved and that they are not petty squabbles, the possible consequences make the squabbles seem very petty in comparison.

 

How exactly would a U.S. default pan out?  Let’s hope we don’t find out. Will the markets see it as a temporary technical factor?  Will chaos ensue?  Perhaps it partly depends on which bills are not paid and how long it lasts.  However a downgrade has its own consequences, depending partly on how much of a downgrade.  Higher interest rates increase government spending for example.  And some investment institutions have investment limits for certain ratings.  A loss of rock solid trust, which may already be happening, can have far reaching consequences.

 

In the vein of associations the U.S. shares with countries we formerly associated with ratings downgrades and sovereign default, I believe that a banana can grow in the U.S. (in Hawaii).

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Shutting down a children’s lemonade stand: All in a day’s work for those in downside risk protection

by Michael Arbow, MBA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

As an entrepreneurial company, RSD Solutions Inc. takes risks all the time so that we may move the company forward.  With each risk or strategy we look at the potential cost of the downside and potential benefits of the upside; one wonders whether Casity Dixon (age 14) fully considered the downside risk of establishing a lemonade stand in Midway, Georgia so to self-finance her trip to a water park.  While I doubt she did some thorough cost/benefit analysis, the local police did it for her and shut Casity's entrepreneurial business operation down because as they said:

 

“(the consumer,...) didn't know how the lemonade was made, who made it or what was in it.”

 

On the surface the police’s logic is sound, but is their action of preventing potential downside risk warranted?  Have children’s lemonade stands been red flagged as causing undue harm to consumers across GA?  When your firm or organization decides to reduce or eliminate downside risk, is it based on founded and proven principles (experience? statistics?) or on some broader undefined concept?  Reducing the downside is important but it is double-edge for the more you reduce downside the more you reduce upside.  

 

For more on this story, click on the link to the Winston-Salem Journal:  http://tinyurl.com/6b2ku7t