Friday, November 4, 2011

Eurozone Rescue Package Euro Implications: Fundamentals vs. Sentiment

by Don Alexander, MBA

Associate, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

Financial markets loved the rescue package as equity markets rallied and the euro surged.  However, this short-term good news for markets did not last as Greek politicians feuded among themselves and Eurozone officials.  As Eurozone policymakers threaten to with hold Greek aid, it raises the question of whether Greece may exit the euro.  The fallout for financial markets could be costly. 

Near-term, the package avoided sovereign default and a banking crisis.  .The rescue package accomplished three objectives: it provided a temporary fix for Greece, backstopped banks writing down Greek sovereign debt and provided a temporary backstop for sovereign debt.  

Long-term, the rescue package is bad news for banks, financial markets and the euro.  Banks will experience a credit crunch as they struggle to meet capital adequacy ratios, the resulting austerity could create a fiscal contraction and provide a negative feedback loop for banks and sovereigns.  It failed to address three specific long-term issues: the package is too small to cover fallout from Italy or Spain, the lack of ECB involvement is a mistake and failed to address treaty reform and long-term monitoring of budget deficits by Eurozone authorities.  Eurozone policymakers may need to consider another rescue package by next summer.

The Euro rallied, after the package was announced, from the positive sentiment.  However, this rally does not appear related to yield differentials.  Current Euro-US short-dated bond rate differentials would suggest a weaker euro against the dollar.  Economic fundamentals and market sentiment are clearly out of line and pose potential downside currency risks once the market digests long-term implications of the package.

Bond investments tend to be one of the largest cross border flows.  Any divergence between currency values and rate differentials suggests that decision to buy and sell currencies may be related to other factors.  It is possible that as European banks may be repatriating funds in anticipation of reducing their balance sheets.  The rising losses on Greek sovereign debt and bank shares trading below book value limit flexibility in raising funds from private investors. This suggests that shrinking the balance as one method to meet capital requirements.

When banks start a deleveraging process, the first adjustment is made to overseas business that is considered non-essential.  A second adjustment may occur when banks attempt to reduce their short-term funding requirements, especially in non-core currency markets away from the euro.  In particular, this could impact trade finance and commodity finance where European banks are major players.

The fact that the euro/dollar is not trading in line with rate differentials suggest other factors may be supporting the euro.  This has allowed the euro to withstand selling pressure against the dollar.  This may allow the euro to be well supported against the dollar as long as repatriation flows continue.  As banks reduce their balance sheets, the impact is deflationary for markets and negative for asset prices.  These policies will serve to weaken the fiscal positions of Eurozone governments, add additional pressure to bank balance sheet and increase the potential default pressure on Greece.  The only long-term answer is ECB involvement and implementation of euro-wide reforms in Brussels.  Otherwise, there is growing sentiment that Greece may exit the euro

Therefore, the prospect of weaker growth prospects and the gradual ending of financial institutions repatriation are negative for financial markets and could spell euro weakness as economic fundamentals reassert themselves or Greece decides to exit the euro.  What is your hedging strategy?  

Thursday, November 3, 2011

The Six Million Dollar Man

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com 

 

The Six Million Dollar Man will likely go down as one of the corniest TV shows of all time.  Bad acting, bad scripts, bad everything. With the exception of one of its opening lines; “We have the technology, we can rebuild him …” the show has been almost totally forgotten.  It is likely that anyone under the age of 40 will have no idea that such a TV show even existed.

 

The premise of the show – rebuilding a super person with the best of technology for various body parts, creates an interesting thought experiment for risk managers though.  If we were to rebuild the most technologically advanced risk manager, what parts (skills) would they have?

 

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Your Great Grandmother

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com 

 

We all grew up getting wisdom passed down from our great-grandmother (or great aunt, etc.)  Timeless quips such as “An apple a day keeps the doctor away.”  As kids, and young adults we often shrugged off these bromides as old-fashioned and quaintly simplistic.  As more mature adults however we likely began to see that there was some value in these simplistic directives that often proved to be more useful than our more modern and sophisticated methods of doing things.  Thus I ask, would your great-grandmother, with her simplistic and folksy wisdom, be a better risk manager than you are with all of your degrees and sophistication?

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Euro Outlook: Fundamentals versus Market Sentiment

by Don Alexander, MBA

Associate, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

The euro has rallied against the US dollar last week ending the week just below 1.39.  This rally does not appear related to yield differentials.  Current Euro-US short-dated bond rate differentials would suggest a weaker euro against the dollar.  Economic fundamentals and market sentiment are clearly out of line and pose potential currency risks.

Bond investments tend to be one of the largest cross border flows.  Any divergence between currency values and rate differentials suggests that decisions to buy and sell currencies may be related to other factors.  It is possible that as European banks may be repatriating funds in anticipation of reducing their balance sheets.  The rising losses on Greek sovereign debt and bank share trading below book value limit flexibility in raising funds from private investors. This suggests that shrinking the balance as one method to meet capital requirements.

When banks start a deleveraging process, the first adjustment is made to overseas business that is considered non-essential.  A second adjustment may occur when banks attempt to reduce their short-term funding requirements, especially in non-core currency markets away from the euro.  In particular, this could impact trade finance and commodity finance where European banks are major players.

The fact that the euro/dollar is not trading in line with rate differentials suggest other factors may be supporting the euro.  This has allowed the euro to withstand selling pressure against the dollar.  This may allow the euro to be well supported against the dollar as long as repatriation flows continue.  As banks reduce their balance sheets, the impact is deflationary for markets and negative for asset prices.  The impact of European bank deleveraging and potential credit rationing could have a strong impact on European growth prospects.

Therefore, the prospect of weaker growth prospects and the gradual ending of financial institutions repatriation could spell weakness for the euro as economic fundamentals start to reassert themselves.  What is your hedging strategy?  

Monday, October 31, 2011

Wordless PowerPoint

by Rick Nason, PhD, CFA

Partner, RSD Solutions Inc.

www.RSDsolutions.com

info@RSDsolutions.com

 

 

We all dislike (hate) the conference PowerPoint presentation.  Slide after slide dulling your senses and killing grey cells – forever to be forgotten 7 nanoseconds after the conclusion of the presentation.

 

To combat death by PowerPoint various new styles and formats are being promoted – and indeed I try to integrate some of the new styles into my professional and academic presentations.  One of the more common types of “enlightened” presentation is to construct a PowerPoint that has no words – only pictures.  The thinking behind this is that pictures evoke emotions (which are better remembered and understood by audience members) and pictures also force listeners to focus on the speaker (and who, as speaker, does not want the focus to be on them?)  Wordless PowerPoints are rapidly catching on, and I suspect you have been the victim (or perhaps the perpetrator) of them yourself. 

 

As a consultant I have an idea and a challenge for you.  The next time you have to give a risk presentation, can you make it mathless?  Can you give a risk presentation that has no math, no numbers, and no graphs?  Can you create a risk based presentation that evokes emotions, understanding, and keeps the focus on you – the speaker and professional?